
5.23.2007
While lying in bed wondering why I am so very single in my life I consider the two people I feel closest to, neither of whom is available, and ask myself how I could be so consistently wrong about love in the world, about love in real-time. I am longing for physical love, conjugal domesticity, marriage, a long-term someone to say goodnight to, the comfort of human warmth shared in my bed. My heart quakes at the lack I feel within. This loneliness cuts so deep sometimes.
I resolve to dive deeper into the love I feel rather than lament not being closer to either of the two people who inspire the feeling. I resolve to hold onto this love itself as my Beloved. If God is love, then love is the Beloved and has a life of its own.
I hold all this love like a rare and precious fluid, an elixir all my own, cupping it in the well of my heart.
Like this, I fall asleep.
Dream: There is a very small wooden hut with sleeping quarters. It is larger than a tool shed but not quite a house. This is the only structure as far as the eye can see, and it is situated in the middle of a vast barren field, completely devoid of any vegetation. We are a group of 10 to 16 people. We are each given a shovel and told that we have only a certain amount of time to find the buried treasure. The shovels and this challenge both are presented to us by beings that we do not see. They seem to be, if you will, “off-stage.” The treasure hunting challenge is equally presented as a serious task, a contest of skill, and a fun game. My cousin Fox and I are paired together and we set off at a good clip in the same general direction. In no time we lose sight of all the others.
Right from the start I have taken this challenge very seriously. I find it a great adventure, also, which makes it fun. The further afield I go, the more assiduously I dig wherever I stop. I always see Fox somewhere not far away as I dig and dig, then move about again, in several areas. Fox is not digging, however. He is looking across the field at something, an impatient and somewhat disinterested look on his face.
Finally, my intuition tells me to stop and dig in one place only. I settle on a spot southeast of the hut where we started. I don’t have to dig terribly long or hard there (the soil is very rich, pliable and dark) before my shovel strikes something hard. The sound of metal against metal startles my ears. I dig around this object and unearth it with my shovel. It is a sterling silver chalice.
“Fox, look!” I cry out. “I found something!”
Fox is within earshot and comes closer. He looks at my find and is clearly unimpressed. Granted, one silver chalice would not appear to be the treasure.
But curiosity compels me, and I continue digging further down. Again and again my shovel makes contact with more sterling silver home furnishings – the kinds of things a bride and groom receive as wedding gifts: a vase, a pitcher, candlesticks, ornate trays, a serving spoon, etcetera. I keep tossing these things in Fox’s direction, but he remains unimpressed, even a little upset with me. He’s still surveying the lay of the field, preoccupied and ready to move on.
Before too long I have dug deep enough to realize that all these silver wedding gifts are not buried in the soil willy-nilly. They are all coming up from a long wooden shelf that I have uncovered. Digging a little more, I break through to a spacious yet intimate, warmly lit bedroom. Clearly it is the bedroom of a young married couple. The walls of the bedroom are of fragrant cedar, as are all the shelves. There are fascinating art pieces, textiles, books, and a great big comfortable looking bed in the far corner, partially lit by candlelight. Covering the bed is a warm colored patchwork quilt.
“Fox!” I shout. “There’s a bedroom! There’s an underground room here!” I am so happy to find this remarkable and totally unexpected “treasure.”
Fox remains unmoved. He stares at me as if I am crazy to consider this bedroom the treasure. What’s more, his shovel doesn’t even have any dirt on it, as if he hadn’t broken any ground with it yet at all. More than a little impatient with me now, Fox believes that I have trespassed on someone else’s property and doesn't want to have anything to do with it.
“Well,” he says curtly. "I’m not putting all that stuff back in there. Not today. Not unless there are two 7:30’s!”
He implies here that we have to be back at the little hut by 7:30, which time is too close now to attempt putting back all the silver where I found it. He seems to be saying that we will never make it back on time – not unless there’s another 7:30 on the clock, a 7:30 later than the one fast approaching. This is my interpretation of Fox’s two 7:30’s while in the dream.
I hear Fox’s words but now I am the one who is unimpressed. I turn my attention back to my discovery and I have only one intention in my heart and on my mind: “This room is mine. It’s mine to live in and it’s mine to explore. And that’s just what I’m going to do.”
END
I awake from this dream with a spring of well-being rising up from the core of my heart. The sense of well-being is blissful as I reflect on the dream images. They were
more real than real, as I sometimes say about dreams of this nature. Everything was authentically earthy, and digging in the field was a physically satisfying exercise. All of this I find deeply compelling.
I consider the “two 7:30’s” and I believe they must be references to Bible chapters and verses. I open my Bible and explore the New Testament. In 1 Corinthians, chapter 7, there are two verses – 32 and 33 – which speak directly to my marriage paradox:
32 Therefore I would that you were free from worldly cares. For he who is unmarried is concerned in the things of his master, so as to please his master. 33 And he who is married is concerned with worldly things, in order to please his wife.
I am grateful to have this clear guidance. I find it comforting and reassuring.
The dream also smacks of Gnostic 'bridal chamber' theology. The bridal chamber, of course, is the 'marriage place', the place of union with the divine. Here are two verses from two different Gnostic scriptures. They shed a bit of light on what I'm saying.
Gospel of Philip, logion 107:
Every one who will enter the bridal chamber will kindle the light, for ... the mysteries of that marriage are perfected rather in the day and the light. Neither that day nor its light ever sets. If anyone becomes a son of the bridal chamber, he will receive the light. If anyone does not receive it while he is here, he will not be able to receive it in the other place. He who will receive that light will not be seen, nor can he be detained. And none shall be able to torment a person like this, even while he dwells in the world. And again when he leaves the world, he has already received the truth in the images. The world has become the Aeon (eternal realm), for the Aeon is fullness for him. This is the way it is: it is revealed to him alone, not hidden in the darkness and the night, but hidden in a perfect day and a holy light.
In the
Gospel of Thomas there are several references to the solitary seeker, the 'loner', or
monakhos. In logion 75 the lone seeker finds and enters the bridal chamber, which is of course the place of union:
Jesus said: There are many standing at the door, but the loners are they who shall enter the marriage place.The way of the spiritual loner, or
monakhos in Greek, is not one that we hear much about in the 21st century. Perhaps if the deeply spiritual life had a clearer and more integrated place in our modern world, and particularly if this aspect did, I would have had an easier time understanding my place and my way in the context of my own world. The
monakhos is precisely what
Gospel of Thomas translator Hugh MacGregor Ross writes about in an informative short essay of the same title:
MonakhosThere are three significant words in Thomas that have come down to us in untranslated Greek. We cannot tell whether they were originally spoken in Aramaic, but by their very nature that seems unlikely. Therefore they were spoken by Jesus in Greek, and it means that when he used them he was speaking to the Hellenists. Thomas did not have to translate them, they were not translated into Coptic, and they cannot be translated into English. All we can do is to try to grasp the meanings that Jesus intended.
The first of these is
monakhos (spelt in our letters). In Thomas it is used in three logia, #16, #49 and #75.
Monakhos is used only very rarely in the Bible, so we cannot gain much help from their contexts. Most western writers on Thomas render it as 'solitaires'. This derives from placing emphasis on the first half, mono- or mona- as in monastery. Because there is an idea amongst scholars that Thomas originated in or was subsequently modified by an ascetic community, it is assumed (without any discussion) that the Gospel was part of the tradition that took men out into the desert—the Desert Fathers—to live as hermits, or took them into monasteries. This occurred in about the 3rd century A.D.
However the Metanoia scholars have discerned much more, and offer a commentary of supreme profundity (logion #75): The term
monakhos is without doubt the master-word of the
Gospel of Thomas.
The
monakhos is he who has made the two One or is engaged on an irreversible path that leads him to the One. In him, contradictions, oppositions, divisions are abolished or on the way to being abolished: the mind is reduced to its function as a servant; the ego no longer impedes the acquisition of knowledge, that is to say direct experience. The marriage place, or the nuptial chamber, is the inner Kingdom where the alchemy takes place during which ignorance is removed. The marriage place is where the illusion of duality ceases; but it ceases not by the fusion of two entities, since the One is alone, it ceases through the intuitive knowledge that nothing exists except Him, and that I am no other than Him.
We can even go further than this when we consider the context in which Jesus uses the word: #49 ... they shall stand boldly being
monakhos.
So it becomes appropriate to quote from the 'Jesus untouched' book: "To stand boldly as a
monakhos requires a certain sort of Courage, with a kind of determination and resolution. To walk one's spiritual life with independence, without going with the herd, whether that be in the community or within the family. It is because what Jesus came for was new, something different. That Courage resides in and comes from the Real Self."
H.McG.R
Finally, much
Bible scholarship in recent years has focused on the senses in which the word
eunuch is used in Matthew 19:11-12, where there is good reason to believe it is used in some places as a euphemism for 'homosexual'. This makes a lot of sense:
10 The disciples said to him, "If this is the situation between a husband and wife, it is better not to marry."
11 Jesus replied, "Not everyone can accept this word, but only those to whom it has been given. 12 For some are eunuchs because they were born that way; others were made that way by men; and others have renounced marriage because of the kingdom of heaven. The one who can accept this should accept it."I do.
Mattai the Preacher offers insight about the original Aramiac context of verse 12:
The Aramaic word m'haym-ne (plural) is translated as eunuchs here, but the root meanings of this word in this form are: trusted ones, faithful ones and believers. These "trusted ones" were also servants such as chamberlains, eunuchs and officers. In addition, m’haym-ne meant homosexual males because they were trusted around women that were married or were not of their family. They weren’t a threat in committing adultery with another man’s wife or in having premarital sex with the women of the nation. [Photo: Eenar]